Culture War: Love is the only winning strategy.

Culture War Game

I am deeply distressed when I hear Christians use the phrase “Culture War.” The phrase suggests that anyone who disagrees with a Christ-followers viewpoint can be treated as an enemy combatant: a person to be opposed, conquered, and vanquished by any means deemed necessary. This position is absurd, and nothing could be further from the central truth of the gospel.

The term Culture War was popularized in the 1990s by James Davison Hunter in his book Culture Wars: The Struggle To Control The Family, Art, Education, Law, And Politics In America. Amazon describes the book as “a riveting account of how Christian fundamentalists, Orthodox Jews, and conservative Catholics have joined forces in a battle against their progressive counterparts for control of American secular culture.”

The Culture War between secular society and Christianity in the 1990s.

Since the 1990s, a large segment of the Church has isolated itself or forcefully engaged the culture through political means.

Christianity has always had individuals and groups that were ambivalent to the prevailing secular culture. They were blissfully unaware of any conflict or disinterested in participating.

culture war isolation.
Some chose to withdraw and isolate themselves from the world and any culture war involving their faith.

Christianity has individuals and communities that have withdrawn from society, becoming self-sufficient, self-contained, and self-absorbed. They have created a subculture where they listen to Christian music, read Christian authors, and follow celebrity Christians on social media.

There is a segment of Christianity that has waged war with the secular culture. They have sought to exert political influence and legislate morality. They were well organized and vocal.

Culture War KNight shiny
Some of these individuals viewed themselves as white knights engaging in a culture war. (Photo by Artur Tumasjan on Unsplash )

For them, the world is neatly divided into two camps, those who stand for Christ and those who oppose him. Over time they became more entrenched in their positions and rationalized that this culture war was important enough to win by any means necessary.

The natural progression of this approach is seen today.

Personal attacks on an individual rather than their position, refusing to listen and interrupting when the other party is speaking, intentionally misquoting, and wrongly characterizing another person’s contentions have all become accepted behavior, even by Christ-followers.

Believing that we can coerce someone to accept the gift of God’s grace by force or legislating morality is insanity.

But this is not the first time that the church and secular culture have conflicted.

The Culture War between the Roman Empire and the Early Church.

The Culture War knight shoe
The early church won the culture war with Rome one relationship at at time.

Historical sources give us some details concerning the early church’s common misrepresentations and the persecution they faced from the Roman Empire and the prevailing culture.

(An excerpt concerning the secular sources of history at the time of Christ is available here.) 

The early 1st-century church celebrated a communal meal that they called Agape (love-feast). The non-christian culture assumed this referred to incest or some other sexual immorality. 

The early church observed the Lord’s Supper. Those outside the church heard the phrase, “take, it, this is my body,” and accused the early church of cannibalism.

The Roman Empire viewed the Christian’s refusal to offer sacrifices to the Roman gods and worship the emperor as treason. Many were persecuted and died for their faith.

The Apostle Paul and others openly involved themselves in a dialogue in the synagogues and public forums with opposing views. And there is no disputing the effectiveness of their arguments.

But these leaders were not surprised or personally offended when rejected. They knew that the preaching of the cross was foolishness to many of the people they addressed.

It was not rhetoric that was the primary means of influencing the secular culture. Many people could not read, and not everyone had access to the apostles’ writings or the ability to travel to meet them.

What can we learn from how the early church responded to its culture war?

The early church thrived because they extended unconditional love, creating transformed relationships that engaged and eventually shaped the secular culture.

Jesus had taught his followers to love God, others, and even their enemies who persecuted them. The early church embraced this teaching. They fed the poor and took care of the sick.

They ministered to the culture by taking care of individuals who were not a part of their faith. They loved without an agenda, and they willingly died for their faith. Instead of being on a war-footing, they were on a mission of love.

Love is a winning strategy. You can’t effectively argue against someone who chooses to love you unconditionally.

Christianity took root in the culture because the early church focused on building transformative relationships.

It is not surprising that the New Testament authors focused much of their writings on being in a right relationship with God, others, and even the civil authorities.

They understood that Christianity was not solely about a set of beliefs but a personal connection to God through His son Jesus. Christ’s kingdom was to be built one relationship at a time.

The danger for any of us is when we lose sight of this simple central and unalterable truth, that Christianity is first and foremost about a relationship with God.

Call To Action

As a result of meeting the needs of those around them and engaging in transformative relationships, the early church influenced and shaped the culture. We can learn from their example.

As Christ-followers, how will we interact with those who oppose our faith? Can we be an advocate for treating those outside the faith with unconditional love and respect?

My prayer this week: God, help me not focus on winning the argument or changing someone’s behavior, but on the opportunity to introduce them to the one who makes me want to be a better person.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *